Ezio Manzini

Design research for sustainability

This article was co-written by Ezio Manzini and Jorge Frascara.

The Changing the Change Conference’s main aim is to present and discuss the design research contribution to the transition towards a sustainable knowledge society. That is, its capability to generate visions, proposals and tools to re-orient the emerging knowledge society towards more socially and environmentally sustainable directions.

This aim is based on some concepts that have to be clarified and discussed.

Knowledge society: it is the result of a large transformation that is taking place at a global scale. Its meaning overlaps the ones of service, information and network society: concepts that represent different expressions of the same on-going complex phenomenon.
In the Changing the Change conference we assume that the evolution towards the knowledge society, even if presents some positive characters, as it appears today, is not bringing us to a sustainable direction. It has to be well understood, but, at the same time it has to be re-orientated. In other words, the transition towards a knowledge society is the “big on-going change” that has to be changed.

Sustainability: in recent time the use of words “sustainability” (as a noun) and “sustainable” (as an adjective) has become quite common. This popularity can be seen as the positive expression of a growing concern for the environment. But, at the same time, it presents the risk of being mis-used. That is, used in superficial ways (little environmental improvements proposed as steps to sustainability) or even as “green washing” strategies (presenting some green initiatives to cover deeply un-sustainable ways of doing).
In the Changing the Change conference we use the term “sustainability” only in relation to deep and systemic changes in the ways of thinking, living and producing. In other words, systemic changes, in our view, are the pre-condition to generate visions or proposals that can be presented as “sustainable”.

Visions, proposals, tools: they summarise design’s main results. Visions are images of how a whole context could be like if new conditions where given (what if a new idea of wellbeing, of development, of production, of eating were disseminated?). Proposals are original combinations of products, services and communications capable to face specific issues (such as housing, mobility, health, food,…) in an original way. Tools are conceptual and practical instruments that permit the enhancing of these visions and proposals.
In the Changing the Change conference we assume that the social learning process that should bring us towards a sustainable society has to be fed by these visions and proposals. And supported by these design tools.

Design research: it is a research activity developed with design tools, skills and sensitivity; where “research” stands for the production of knowledge that can be shared and accumulated to become the starting point for new researches and specific projects; and where the expression “developed with design tools, skills and sensitivity“ stands for a research activity developed by designers who explore complex design issues and generate visions and solutions.
In the Changing the Change conference we assume that the transition towards a sustainable knowledge society is such a large and new challenge that individual design activities are only a good first step, but cannot be enough. They are a good first step because individuals can move with agility, explore possibilities and develop models, but design for sustainability calls for a community of designers working and debating with other actors to build a new design knowledge and a new set of visions and proposals.

If you are a designer and have done work in this direction, Changing the Change is the opportunity for you to share your experience and work toward the creation of the much needed change toward a sustainable society.


6 Responses to “Design research for sustainability”

  • With all my respect for the authors of this blog, the definition of design research doesn’t define anything: it mention 8 times the word design (I also counted “design-ers”), but it does not explain why, for instance “designers who explore complex design issues and generate visions and solutions” are necessarily doing design research. Is this a provocation? Do you want this blog to come to a better definition? If so I try some other question: is design research necessarily a research activity performed by designers? Why designers? What is in there in the activity of designers that makes this kind of research so different from the other kinds of research?
    Please, forgive me if my questions are too stupid

    .......

  • Trained as a designer, I still do not have a clear idea of the term design research. So Nicola, I feel the same.
    My way of making sense of this term is to put it in the context of my work. During a class when we were trying to understand what this term means one of my students put it well, she said, “I can use conversations as research, I never thought of it like that!” I know that young people in India do not see themselves as participating in the issues around them in a way that other cultures enable. So starting from hunches, doing dirty prototyping, testing and observing and conversing help create possibilities that otherwise do not seem feasible. I have just finished teaching a class which we called “From Common Sense to Common Pratice.” My co-teacher Zackery has put some of the visualisations on his blog http://www.zackdenfeld.com/?p=118. For me, this is one way that design research can be defined. Also I think this way of talking will help me discuss ideas with other designers and stakeholders in a more authentic way and allow me to draw on the diversity of their experiences.

    .......

  • Our definition of design research indicates what, starting the Changing the Change organisation process, we (Jorge and I) intend with this expression. This definition and, I would say the whole conference, have been proposed, also, to start a discussion on the meaning of this term. This means that, of course, all the comments and contributions are more than welcome!

    Given that, and speaking for myself, in the proposed definition there were two parts, corresponding to the concepts of research activity, in general (“the production of knowledge that can be shared and accumulated to become the starting point for new researches and specific projects”), and of design research, in particular (“a research activity developed with design tools, skills and sensitivity”). Of course, the both these definitions can be discussed. As a contribution to this discussion I will give my personal answers to your questions.

    “why … ‘designers who explore complex design issues and generate visions and solutions’ are necessarily doing design research?”

    They are not necessarily doing design research. Their activity can be considered as a design research only if it produces a design knowledge that can be discussed, shared and accumulated. And, doing so, it can become the starting point for new researches and/or to be applied in specific projects. Of course, on this point, the discussion is open: how to define this kind of discussable and sharable knowledge?

    “Is design research necessarily a research activity performed by designers?”

    Yes, if it is a research activity done with design tools, skills and sensitivity we can assume that who develop it can be considered as a designer, even if he/she does not define him/her self in this way.

    “What is in the activity of designers that makes this kind of research so different from the other kinds of research?”

    The fact that, as I wrote, it is developed with design tools, skills and sensitivity. That is, with tools, skills and sensitivity that are different form those used in developing a research, for instance, in physics or in human sciences.

    .......
    Ezio Manzini

  • Dear CtC Team – Seasons greetings to all:
    I have added a link to your conference at the site and blog indicated below and hope this meets with your approval? Noting your themes and objectives the site and blog -

    http://hodges-model.blogspot.com/

    - introduced below may in turn be of interest?

    Originally created in the UK by Brian E Hodges (Ret.) at Manchester Metropolitan University -

    Hodges’ Health Career – Care Domains – Model [h2cm]

    http://www.p-jones.demon.co.uk/

    - can help map health, social care and OTHER issues, problems and solutions. The model takes a situated and multi-contextual view across four knowledge domains:

    * Interpersonal;
    * Sociological;
    * Empirical;
    * Political.

    Our links pages cover each care (knowledge) domain e.g. SCIENCES:

    http://www.p-jones.demon.co.uk/linksTwo.htm

    - where another link is listed under ‘Environment, Ecology & EcoSystem Health’.

    INTERPERSONAL:
    http://www.p-jones.demon.co.uk/links.htm

    SOCIOLOGY:
    http://www.p-jones.demon.co.uk/links3.htm

    Thank you for your time and best wishes with your plans for 2008 and beyond.

    Peter Jones
    Community Mental Health Nurse Older Adults,
    Independent Scholar & Informatics Specialist
    Bolton
    Lancashire
    UK

    h2cm: help 2C more – help 2 listen – help 2 care

    .......

  • Dear Ezio.

    How are you ?

    Just yesterday, talking with Bartholo, I took notice of this web site and could read a bit about the conference aims, etc.

    I´m considering sending 2 abstracts concerning (1) design teaching and (2) design and strategy, both related to the current and foreseeing changes that we face. I´m not sure, however, if theoretical works are welcome. What do you think ?

    Best regards,

    Luiz Brasil

    .......

  • why tere is less book or pubbliaction about a social approch of design professional..

    Some author and designer speak about social design when a project is about healt, poverty, anciant, disable, ecc..
    i would like ask you what do you think is a definition of PROJECT BASED ON SOCIAL DESIGN, WHICH ARE THE GUIDELINE FOR MAKING A SOCILA PROJECT, AN EUROPEAN DESIGN CAN PROJECT SOMETHING FOR OTHER CONUTRY UNDER DEVELOPMENT???

    THANKS FOR THE ATTENTION,
    sorry for my english,

    i hope a your responce Ezio

    .......

Leave a Reply


Bookmark it on:

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Simpy
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb